Urgent reforms are needed to the Gambling Act 2005, according to a cross-party group of councils.
Local authorities need more powers to refuse gambling premise license applications that threaten the community’s welfare and safety, according to the group of 38 councils and combined authorities – including 17 London boroughs, the Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, and the Leader of Glasgow Council – who have written to Lisa Nandy, the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport today, Wednesday 2 April.
The coalition of councils, led by Brent, are asking the Government to consider six key reforms to the Gambling Act (2005), from changes to planning and licensing to an overhaul of gambling advertising. The Act in its current form, according to council leaders, risks undermining the health of local communities and high streets, and strips power away from residents and local decision makers.
Brent has the second-highest number of betting premises out of all the London boroughs with 81 shops, which includes betting shops, bingo halls, and adult gaming centres. This is one of the highest concentrations in the UK, and the figure outnumbers essential services such as supermarkets, banks, job centres and GP surgeries. Within the current legislation, councils are not able to reject a premise license solely on public health grounds, no matter the number of public objections.
A study from Bristol University found that betting shops were 10 times more likely to be found in deprived towns than affluent areas. There are six gambling premises within a 600-metre stretch on Harlesden High Street alone - with a seventh to follow later this year – in an area which has an average household income of £23,977 per year, significantly below the London average of £47,500.